Actually, this parameter is no longer used. It is accepted for parameter syntax, but the value now is always set to YES.
The documentation still needs to be update to reflect this information.

At 09:19 AM 2/17/2003 +0100, you wrote:
How about setting diskmap to yes. I think this is lowers the IOwait alot.

-----------------------------------
Christian Pallinder
Exist i Stockholm AB
Propellerv�gen 6B
183 62 T�by
Mobil: +46 (0)70 - 399 27 58




Paul Ripke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2003-02-14 12:30
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"

        To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        cc:
        Subject:        Re: improving performance on solaris 2.8


We found a similar improvement moving dbvols, logvols and disk storage
pool volumes to VXVM raw devices - running both Solaris 7 and Solaris 8.

On Friday, Feb 14, 2003, at 03:13 Australia/Sydney, Lee, Gary D. wrote:

> We have tsm server 4.2.1 running under solaris 2.8 on a sun 3500.
>
> Had plenty of memory (2gb) and a reasonable amount of disk.  However,
> performance even with a gigabit ethernet was less than adequate.
>
> Acting on a couple of replies received from this list, I modified the
> vfstab and changed the database, log, and stgpool file systems to
> "forcedirectio".
>
> Throughput went up by a factor of five or more for almost all clients.
>  Clients with backups of a few large files, showed an increase of
> fifteen times throughput.
>
> Thought this info might help someone.
>
>
> Gary Lee
> Senior Operating Systems Analyst
> Ball State University
> phone 765-285-1310
>
>
>
--
Paul Ripke
Unix/OpenVMS/TSM/DBA
101 reasons why you can't find your Sysadmin:
68: It's 9AM. He/She is not working that late.
-- Koos van den Hout
Dave Canan
TSM Performance
IBM Advanced Technical Support
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to