At one point in time, the documentation actually explained that D01F was the newer track for 3590 MC. I don't know why it reverted back to the old index.html page. I'll look around for where that document went. Maybe someone from IBM can get the index updated. ;-)
bob On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 09:18:48AM -0500, Steve Roder wrote: > > > With all the recent discussion here about I/O errors on tapes being > > >the result of downleveled microcode, I went looking for the latest 3590E > > >code, and all I could find was level 350, which we installed 15 months > > >ago. Can anyone point me at a download site for the newest code? I tried > > >ftp.software.ibm.com, but 350 was the latest, and service2.boulder.ibm.com > > >has none at all, even though I got redirected there. > > > > Steve - The following seems to have the stuff: > > > > ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/3590/code3590 > > I guess my problem is two fold: the index.html file there is out-of-date, > and not knowing/realizing that D0IF_26E.fmrz is newer than D0IE_350.fmrz, > and that D0IF_26E.fmrz is for 3590E's. > > I think that was three things! > > Thanks Rich and Bob! > > Steve Roder, University at Buffalo > HOD Service Coordinator > VM Systems Programmer > UNIX Systems Administrator (Solaris and AIX) > TSM/ADSM Administrator > ([EMAIL PROTECTED] | (716)645-3564)
