Its option 2. Regards,
Karel > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: PAC Brion Arnaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Verzonden: woensdag 30 juli 2003 12:28 > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Onderwerp: Effect of multiple migration processes to a > collocated pool - > serial or parallel node migration ? > > > Hi list, > > A quickie one : when migrating multiple nodes data from > non-collocated disk pool to collocated tape pool, using > migproc=2, in which order will data be migrated ? > 1) node 1 data on 2 different tapes, then node 2 data on 2 > different tapes etc .... > 2) node 1 data on one tape and node 2 data on another tape, > then node 3 data on another tape etc .... > > I would tend to say 1) is the right response, as the order of > nodes processed is per largest amount of data in the disk > storage pool, but wanted to make it sure ... > If my assumption is right, is there any way achieving > parallel mounts for nodes migration (option 2) instead of > serial mounts (option 1) ? This would avoid waste of tapes (2 > tapes created for 1 node migrated, in a collocated pool looks > strange to me), and also from time (tape reclamation will > probably recombine those tapes to a new one after a while) > Thanks in advance ! > Regards. > > Arnaud > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > | Arnaud Brion, Panalpina Management Ltd., IT Group | > | Viaduktstrasse 42, P.O. Box, 4002 Basel - Switzerland | > | Phone: +41 61 226 19 78 / Fax: +41 61 226 17 01 | > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >
