==> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, James R Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are you [other sites substantially invested in 3590's] continuing to
> invest in 3590's -or- are you converting to other (LTO?) tape technology?
3592. Mmmm.
tsm: GLMAIL>q vol T00054
Volume Name Storage Device Estimated Pct Volume
Pool Name Class Name Capacity Util Status
(MB)
------------------------ ----------- ---------- --------- ----- --------
T00054 GLMAIL-3592 3592DEV 569,517.6 97.5 Full
> Is anyone considering/already doing a substantial 3590->LTO conversion?
> If so, we would like to talk with you.
And it fits in your extant 3494.
- Allen S. Rout
