Wanda, you are correct. The copy in the copy pool may be fine, so the backup version isn't really destroyed (assuming the copy in the copy pool is still good). If a primary storage pool volume has damaged files, RESTORE VOLUME can be attempted to restore the volume.
If the volume being audited is a copy storage pool volume and it is audited with FIX=YES, then damaged files will be deleted from the copy pool volume, but the backup version itself won't be deleted from TSM's inventory (because the primary copy still exists). The next time BACKUP STGPOOL is run, new copy pool versions of the damaged files will be created. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence. "Prather, Wanda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 04/08/2004 14:34 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Re: Files Marked Damaged by Audit Volume Andy, If the volume is audited with FIX=YES, BUT the file has a copy in a copy pool, I don't think it gets deleted, does it? Is it eligible for backup again in that case? Thanks Wanda -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 5:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Files Marked Damaged by Audit Volume Hi Andy, When a volume is audited with FIX=NO, damaged files are marked as such, but not deleted. In this case, damaged files are not automatically eligible for backup again just by virtue of being damaged. Consider the possibility that the "damage" could be temporary, such as if the drive on which the audit was performed was dirty; and that once the drive is cleaned, another audit will show the file as being fine. When a volume is audited with FIX=YES, then the damaged files will be deleted. If the damaged file is deleted AND it is the active version, then it will be eligible for backup the next time the client backup runs. If the damaged file is an INACTIVE version, then that by itself will not trigger another backup of the file (but of course the file could be backed up again if it has changed on the client system since the last time the file was backed up). Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence. Andy Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 04/08/2004 08:55 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Files Marked Damaged by Audit Volume If an active file is marked damaged by audit volume, is the file backed up at the next opportunity? We have a situation where at least one tape that had undiscovered damaged files was copied to a copypool tape. Those files are not recoverable at this time. We are contemplating a full audit on all the volumes in the onsite pool, but need to know if the files marked damaged will be backed up again. Thanks for any info.
