However, what isn't mentioned is that many seem to be suffering memory problems with TSAFS, and some (myself included) have had to make the choice between memory leaks/abends depending on the version in use. I can't use TSA5UP13.EXE as a patch, I'm using tsa5up12.exe which has a later tsafsnlm, but leaks rather than crashes.
TSA600 seems to be rather more stable - but true, the performance isn't as good. Tom On 28 Apr 2004 at 14:23, Wolfgang Bayrhof wrote: > Hi Robert, > > maybe you'll find Novell's TID 10089687 interesting. > > http://support.novell.com/cgi-bin/search/searchtid.cgi?/10089687.htm > > Best regards, > Wolfgang Bayrhof > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Robert Ouzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 16:09:48 +0200 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Tsa600.nlm against tsafs.nlm > > > Hi to all > > > > Can anybody explain to me the difference between TSA600.NLM and > > TSAFS.NLM on a Netware version 6.x. > > > > I load once with tsa600 and run a q tsa > > tsa module name: TSA600.nlm > > tsa version: 6.54.0 > > smdr version: 6.54.0 > > user/password valid: yes > > > > I load once with tsafs and run a q tsa > > tsa module name: TSAFS.nlm > > tsa version: 6.54.0 > > smdr version: 6.54.0 > > user/password valid: yes > > > > In two cases my backup run O.K but curious to know the difference if > > any > > !!!!!!!!!!!! > > > > Regards > > > > Robert Ouzen > > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ============================== Tom Anstey Institute of Molecular Medicine Oxford University Oxford OX3 9DS UK
