OK, after spending a large portion of my day reviewing adsm-l post going back to 2000, I'm still not sure. Does anyone know if there is still a performance problem running reclamation on a DIRMC random access disk pool? I came across one post that said it was supposedly fixed, but recommended using a file type diskpool to be safe.
- Re: DIRMC - Are copypool reclamation performance issues... Thorneycroft, Doug
- Re: DIRMC - Are copypool reclamation performance i... Rushforth, Tim
- Re: DIRMC - Are copypool reclamation performance i... Thorneycroft, Doug
- Re: DIRMC - Are copypool reclamation performance i... TSM_User
- Re: DIRMC - Are copypool reclamation performan... Paul Fielding
- Re: DIRMC - Are copypool reclamation performance i... Rushforth, Tim
- Re: DIRMC - Are copypool reclamation performan... Jurjen Oskam
- Re: DIRMC - Are copypool reclamation perfo... Richard Sims
- Re: DIRMC - Are copypool reclamation p... Jurjen Oskam
- Re: DIRMC - Are copypool reclamation performance i... Prather, Wanda
- Re: DIRMC - Are copypool reclamation performan... Steve Bennett
