==> On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 12:27:10 -0500, "Bell, Charles (Chip)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Already scheduled for it, and planning on posing my question there if I > don't have a solution in place by then. Thanks! Might be a dumb question, but you mention > The node in question is holding onto a tape drive for 20+ hours per backup > because of the file inspection it has to do, which is why I want to get JBB > to work. I don't know why you've chosen to do this direct to tape; could you get your resources free by hitting a DISK or FILE devclass instead? The use of a tape might be slowing down your backups, dramatically. Especially with erratic streams, tape positioning time can come to dominate your backup. - Allen S. Rout
