I applied the change to 2 of my windows exchange servers.....here are the results...
Without the DISKBUFFSIZE 32 Server 04 started at 20:00 and completed at 01:21 Server 05 started at 20:00 and completed at 00:22 WITH the DISKBUFFSIZE 32 Server 04 started at 20:00 and completed at 23:07 Server 05 started at 20:00 and completed at 22:35. I will make the change on the rest of the exchange servers today to see the result in the overall run time of the backups. Thanks!! -----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Harris Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 8:12 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Upgrade mystery FWIW Del I applied this change to my SAP nodes and lo-and-behold restore throughput just about quadrupled. But, I applied it to my exchange nodes and there was no discernable difference. YMMV Steve. > -----Original Message----- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Del Hoobler > Sent: Tuesday, 17 January 2006 11:47 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Upgrade mystery > > > Patricia, > > See if this append I made last month helps at all: > > http://msgs.adsm.org/cgi-bin/get/adsm0512/204.html > > Thanks, > > Del > > ---------------------------------------------------- > > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[email protected]> wrote on > 01/17/2006 08:38:42 AM: > > > I just upgraded my windows2k and w2k3 servers from tsm > backup client > > 5.2 to 5.3.0.8. These servers also run the tdp for exchange > v5.2.1.0. > > > > Since then, my exchange backups take an hour longer to complete. > > > > Does anyone know of a conflict with the software? Or a > setting I need > > to set?? > > >
