No, it isn't. One of my onsite pools is collocated (GROUP), but not my copypool.
Bill Boyer "Some days you're the bug, some days you're the windshield" - ?? -----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kelly Martin Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 1:47 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Processes calling for scratch instead of an existing FILLING tape Is the copy storage pool in question collocated? Kelly On 2/7/06, William Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've noticed that processes will fill a tape and then instead of > calling for another FILLING tape in the storage pool, it will mount a > scratch tape. I just saw this again this morning...I had a BA STG > running from onsite tape to offsite tape. There were 4 tapes in the offsite > pool...2 filling.. 1 full..and a filling tape being written to. The current tape filled up and instead of mounting one of the other 2 filling tapes, a new scratch tape was called for. And one of the filling tapes was only 1.4% used! > > I search the TSM site and the archives, but I must not have the > correct search words, 'cause I can't find any hits. My TSM server is > 5.3.2.1 on AIX 5.3 ML2. > > Bill Boyer > "Growing old is mandatory, growing up is optional" - ?? >
