"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[email protected]> wrote on 02/27/2006 11:55:42 AM: > Has anyone out there tried the new 5.3 multi-threaded reclamation > process for offsite copypools? > > In both cases, within a few minutes of processing, all the reclamation > processes for this pool are competing for the same input volume, so one > process continues and the others stall with media wait. > > The documentation doesn't say to not use the parameter for offsite copy > pools, so I'm wondering if this is a bug or working as designed. If > working as designed, then it is pointless for offsite pools.
Well, not exactly. As is mentioned by others, using this for offsite pool reclamation with collocated primary tape pools will minimize the tape volume contention (but may increase the number of tape mounts). But hey! if you run any three tape processes, and they all need data off the same volume, there's going to be contention no matter how you slice it. -- Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) US Bank MR Backup and Recovery Management Office 262.790.3190 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any attachments, contains information that is, or may be, covered by electronic communications privacy laws, and is also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error, and then immediately delete it. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. ==============================================================================
