anyone? Ideas? -----Original Message----- From: Park, Rod Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 7:10 AM To: 'ADSM: Dist Stor Manager' Subject: RE: [ADSM-L] Random Access Disk Pools
So, can someone explain the difference at the TSM level and aggregate level. Really I'm trying to understand, if I have a primary disk pool that does not migrate, it will be the final onsite resting place of data. As data expires and fragmentation occurs. That space is unusable if I'm not migrating to another primary area? Eventually I'll have to allocate more? Below is what comparison doc showed as "consideration of fragmentation" for random access pools. Guess I'm not sure what the diff is between tsm level and aggregate level. TSM level - fragmentation will occur as TSM allocates and frees space within the Storage Pool. Migration tends to relieve this fragmentation Aggregate level - fragmentation occurs as files expire within an aggregate. DISK pools cannot reclaim this wasted space until all files in the aggregate have expired -----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rushforth, Tim Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 11:21 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Random Access Disk Pools See http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=0&uid=swg21218415 for comparison of disk vs devclass=file This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended addressee, then you have received this email in error and any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. Please notify us immediately of your unintended receipt by reply and then delete this email and your reply. Tyson Foods, Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliates will not be held liable to any person resulting from the unintended or unauthorized use of any information contained in this email or as a result of any additions or deletions of information originally contained in this email.
