--- Dave Mussulman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 09:47:08PM +0200, Kurt > Beyers wrote: > > The two copy pools behave completely > independently. > > > > Each command "backup stgpool <primary> <copy>" > will compare the files in both storage pools and > copy the data that are in the <primary> pool and not > yet in the <copy> pool. > > I presume that same 1-to-1 primary/copy mapping is > true for a file that > gets migrated between primary pools that both backup > to the same copy > pool? > > For example, a disk and a tape primary pool and a > tape copy pool. The > file is created on the disk pool, and copied to the > tapecopy pool. > Later, that file is migrated from the disk pool to > the tape pool. > > When the tape pool is next copied to the tapecopy > pool, does the file > transfer again? Or does TSM know there's already a > copy of that file > migrated from another primary pool? > > I believe from my evaluation that the copying is > happening twice, but > I'm not sure. My assumption, in that case, is that > the disk pool copy > is expired at that point, so even if the copying > happens twice, the > actual post-reclaimation copy pool storage is > singular. > > I'm new and still getting used to the concepts, so a > confirmation/correction would be appreciated. > Thanks! > > Dave >
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
