>> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:06:17 -0500, Mark Stapleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I would *never* use a SATA pool for a primary TSM storage pool. Allen the Pedant simply has to chime in on this. I'm actually contemplating a SATA pool for a large chunk of "primary" storage right now. However, this primary data is online/nearline storage for a Content Manager installation. It is used as a document-management system to make some of our offices less paperful; the access patterns for this make a very good fit. Another primary stgpool we're considering sticking on SATA is the Space Managed data. It's a great way to consolidate large, seldom-used filespaces, and again the access patterns fit very nicely. Now, I don't think I'm actually disagreeing with Mark in these cases, but my antennae quiver whenever we approach a philosophical asymptote. - Allen S. Rout - I could *never* keep my mouth shut. ;)
