>> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 12:23:36 -0400, Sergio Fuentes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:


> - nmon traces and the nmon_analyzer are really good at illustrating your 
> overall
> performance.  topas, or top is also useful for active monitoring.  vmstat as
> well.  During our slowdown our DB was seeing an average of 30-40 TPS per disk.
> Post-slow down we now see 90-120 TPS per disk.

So what stanzas do you use for data collection and analysis here?

I think it would be immensely useful if we could compare similar
results.

I see 15-40 TPS in normal backgroun work, and peak out at 190-200, and
I've got 10K 18G SSA, usually with 2 or 3 LVs on each PV.  But it's
hard to compare, because I've got lots of servers sharing the same DB
volumes.

- Allen S. Rout

Reply via email to