Hi.... Tnx's for information. So what size should a standalone server (VmWare server slice) be?? Based upon the below comment (resource hog), i.e. 1-1.4GHZ proc minimum and 1GB memory minimum is not enough, what size should it be??
-----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Fox Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 5:12 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Admin Console on VmWare server Depending on your hardware setup for the VMWare environment that could be very beneficial. Seperating the new admin console is a big plus since in my experience, it has been a resource hog. You actually have me interested in trying the same thing. I think I'll be asking our guys to do the same. On 11/9/06, Lamb, Charles P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi....... > > > > We are looking at upgrading our TSM V5.2 software package to V5.3 which > is currently on an IBM RISC (IBM 7026-H80, 16GB of memory, 6-750MHZ > proc, IBM 3584-L32/D32 Library with 14-LTO2 FC drives, 2TB of changed > data per day, 35TB data on-site and 35TB data off-site, 200 servers - > RISC & Intel). We are looking at installing the TSM Admin console on an > Intel VmWare server per our Intel team and leaving the other parts of > TSM on the IBM RISC server. Anyone have any experience on this VmWare > type of installation? Any pro's or con's on this VmWare type of > installation? Any operational concerns considering this type of TSM > installation which the group could address?? Is the EOSL on TSM V5.2 to > be April 30, 2007?? > > > > Tnx's a bunch for your input>>>>>>>> >
