You should know that many MC's can be defined in a single PD; read about this in online help for the DEFINE MGMTCLAS cmd. See, also, the client option definition for INCLUDE -- the unique format used to associate a different MC with various filename/filetype patterms.
Regards, Don -------------- Original message from "RODOLFICH, NICHOLAS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -------------- > How is this possible? Only 2 copy groups can be present in a MC. Only > one policy set within a policy domain can be active at a time. I don't > see how it can be done in the same policy domain. Could you be more > specific? > > Regards, > > Nicholas > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Don France > Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 11:16 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] backup destination change possible? > > You could use management class within the same PD; the same > way you'd use a different MC for incrementals or differentials (ie, > the logs), just add the appropriate INCLUDE statement in their opt file. > > Also, consider sending the disk_mc data to a storage pool that migrates > to the same tapepool as the other, direct-to-tape TDP nodes (to keep > all the TDP data in the same tape pool, for expiration/reclamation > efficiency). > > Don France
