Wow. VTLs were meant to fix problems, not cause them. Does anyone else have any real world experience with these and/or other VTLs?
Is your experience similar? -----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles A Hart Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 3:13 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] CDL4200 Active Engine Failover integration with TSM on AIX5.3 This is why we still front end with Diskpools... as we have had CDL and VTFopen VTL's go to lunch. Our philosophy is we need to get a good backup and do not want to have our DBA's move Logs around while we fix the VTL... Charles Hart Rajesh Oak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[email protected]> 06/06/2007 08:36 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[email protected]> To [email protected] cc Subject [ADSM-L] CDL4200 Active Engine Failover integration with TSM on AIX5.3 Can some one give me some insight into the CDL4200 Active Engine Failover integration with TSM on AIX5.3? In the state of CDL engine failure, there is a lot of manual intervention intervention with AIX and TSM. This means downtime, and missed backups if CDL is not monitored. Is there something that can be done to get around this problem? Rajesh This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.
