Thanks for the confirmation. That was pretty much what I guessed. The script seems to just check for license files and whether to perform a "new" install versus an "upgrade".
Richard van Denzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[email protected]> 10/24/2007 11:12 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[email protected]> To [email protected] cc Subject Re: [ADSM-L] Upgrading TSM Linux server Hi Zoltan, I always use "rpm -Uvh TIVsm-server-5.4.1-0.x86_64.rpm". I have had some bad experiences with the install_server script in the past. Btw, if you have both 5.1.4.2 and 5.1.4.0 rpm's in the same directory you should be able to do just: "rpm -Uvh TIVsm-server-5.4.1-2.x86_64.rpm". Met vriendelijke groet, with kind regards, Richard van Denzel. -----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU Sent: 24 October 2007 16:48 To: [email protected] Subject: [ADSM-L] Upgrading TSM Linux server We recently started experiencing strange, unexplainable (yes.......nothing has changed since the server was installed) crashes (cores) with our 5.4.0.0 Linux-x64 server (3-within the last 24-hours - haven't had any until now, since the server was installed 4-months ago). So, I am going to install 5.4.1.0 and patch it to 5.4.1.2 since I see lots of crash issues addressed/resolved in 5.4.1.2 Is there any particular reason to use the "install_server" script or can I just "rpm -Uvh TIVsm-server-5.4.1-0.x86_64.rpm" ?
