At an architectural level, is it a good idea to have your TSM databases on something like the NetApp???
-----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sam Sheppard Sent: Thursday, 18 December 2008 2:29 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM database on NETAPP TSM Server 5.5.1 on Solaris10, Sun V240. I need to relocate my database volumes and have been assigned a LUN on one of our Netapp FAS6030 devices. I allocated 6 new volumes and then deleted one of the old volumes (5GB) and the move process started and is running at about 600MB/hour. I'm not real familiar with the performance characteristics of the Netapp box, but am assured by the Unix/Netapp guys that it's a great performer (it's FC-connected). This seems way slow to me and I haven't seen this poor performance doing the same kind of operation on my ESS. Anyone have any experience with the TSM database on one of these devices? I know the original network-attached storage had write performance problems, but this seems ridiculous. TIA Sam Sheppard San Diego Data Processing Corp. (858-581-9668) <html> <body> <font face="arial" color=#808080 size="-2"><img alt="Santos Logo" src="http://www.santos.com/library/logo.gif";> <br>Santos Ltd A.B.N. 80 007 550 923<br> Disclaimer: The information contained in this email is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please immediately advise us by return email and delete the email without making a copy.</font> <font face="arial" color=#008000 size="-2">Please consider the environment before printing this email</font> </body> </html>
![http://www.santos.com/library/logo.gif"](http://www.santos.com/library/logo.gif"){kind=link}