Hi there, Just wanne point out that even if you do have your data on tape you need to be able to restore it with possibly the drive you did write it and of course compatible software.
Hardware maintenance cost would be a killer and might force you to migrate data to new media in 10 years from now anyway when capacity is larger again... I'm not sure if you can count on lto being able to read lto media 25 years old. Cheers, Stefan _____________________ Stefan Reichle Holcim Group Support Ltd Corporate IT 5113 Holderbank AG Phone +41 58 858 65 11 Fax +41 58 858 66 70 Mobile +41 79 321 46 52 [email protected] www.holcim.com This e-mail is confidential and intended only for the use of the above named addressee. If you have received this e-mail in error, please delete it immediately and notify us by e-mail or telephone. ----- Originalnachricht ----- Von: "Huebschman, George J." [[email protected]] Gesendet: 05.05.2009 16:25 AST An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: [ADSM-L] LTO for long term archiving Does anyone have 25 year old tape media or tape drives around? Will you stil be able to use LTOx media in 25 years? -----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thomas Denier Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 4:11 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [ADSM-L] LTO for long term archiving I work for a large hospital. I have been asked to investigate possible configurations for archiving something between a few hundred terabytes and a petabyte of data for 25 years. This would be clinical records that we need to keep in case of a malpractice suit. The retention period is 25 years because there are two ways we can get sued for alleged malpractice involving a pediatric patient. The parents or guardians have a seven year window of opportunity to file suit, starting at the time of the alleged malpractice. The patient has a seven year window of opportunity, starting at his or her 18th birthday. In principle, the retention period should vary depending on patient age, but nobody I have talked to so far thinks it is practical to sort records in this way; they want a uniform retention period that covers the worst case scenario (a patient allegedly harmed as a newborn suing just before the end of his or her seven year window). As far as I can tell, the most expensive part of such a configuration is the media, and LTO media will cost about a third as much as the most economical MagStar media (extended length 3592 volumes read and written with TS1130 drives). With the sort of workload described above I don't expect any difficulty staying within the recommended limit on the number of times an LTO volume passes over the tape heads. Are there any other reasons to be nervous about using LTO for long term archives? IMPORTANT: E-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Legg Mason therefore recommends that you do not send any confidential or sensitive information to us via electronic mail, including social security numbers, account numbers, or personal identification numbers. Delivery, and or timely delivery of Internet mail is not guaranteed. Legg Mason therefore recommends that you do not send time sensitive or action-oriented messages to us via electronic mail. This message is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged or confidential information. Unless you are the intended recipient, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone any information contained in this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify the author by replying to this message and then kindly delete the message. Thank you.
