NDMP in general. It's not the storage pool situation that bothers me. I actually prefer the native, lan-free arrangement. It is much faster than going over IP.
It's the fact you have to do the old unix-style level-0, level1 backups compared to the typical TSM incremental-forever. Regards, Shawn ________________________________________________ Shawn Drew Internet [email protected] Sent by: [email protected] 05/06/2009 11:58 AM Please respond to [email protected] To ADSM-L cc Subject Re: [ADSM-L] Tough questions for Netapp representatives Are you referring to the older version of NDMP, or the "Filer-to-Server" capability that was added with TSM 5.4? This allows you (I believe) to store the NDMP data in normal TSM storage pools, rather than sending directly to a NAS-attached tape library. At 11:38 AM 5/6/2009, Shawn Drew wrote: >Also, >since you have to do periodic fulls and differential incrementals, it >generates so much waste data that we can't store all the tapes in the >library, so we have to run around for tapes. -- Paul Zarnowski Ph: 607-255-4757 Manager, Storage Services Fx: 607-255-8521 719 Rhodes Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-3801 Em: [email protected] This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified. Please note that certain functions and services for BNP Paribas may be performed by BNP Paribas RCC, Inc.
