On Aug 18, 2010, at 5:54 AM, Mehdi Salehi wrote: > Hi everyone, > stg1 has stg2 as copy pool and they are synced. If you set the copystg of > stg1 to null, why stg2 still has copy data of stg1? Why doesn't TSM > delete/expire the copy data?
Because it should not, according to the architecture. The role of a copy storage pool is to retain a copy of data as long as that data is in the primary pool from which it was copied.
