Hi, I'm sorry, but you are wrong, duplex mismatch Does cause the speed to drop to Aboutaleb 5K/s. I've Deen Thissen on numerous occasions.
-- Gr., Remco On 7 sep. 2010, at 08:02, Niklas Lundström <[email protected]> wrote: > I actually restored the files to my workstation, and the network settings are > fine > Duplex mismatch does not cause the speed to go down to modem-speed from > 1995.... > > > -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- > Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[email protected]] För Remco Post > Skickat: den 7 september 2010 07:40 > Till: [email protected] > Ämne: Re: [ADSM-L] 50Mb restored in 4.18h.... > > On 7 sep 2010, at 07:02, Niklas Lundström wrote: > >> Hello >> >> I just did a restore of 50Mb and it took 4h 18min >> If it had been 50Gb I wouldn't complain >> >> Total number of objects restored: 114 >> Total number of objects failed: 0 >> Total number of bytes transferred: 50.99 MB >> Data transfer time: 9,426.15 sec >> Network data transfer rate: 5.53 KB/sec <-------------- >> Aggregate data transfer rate: 3.36 KB/sec >> Elapsed processing time: 04:18:55 >> >> The server has a lot of files, almost 7 million including the copypool. The >> TSM DB is really big, 180Gb and 94% full. >> TSM Server 5.5.4. >> >> Does anyone have a clue of why the restore took so long? >> > > your network sucks? (to put it mildly :) ) I'd check to see if there is any > mismatch in duplex settings anywhere. Remember, auto-negotiation on the host, > and a fixed 100 full-duplex setting on the switch will lead to a host at > half-duplex and tons of collisions. > > >> It found what volumes to mount fast, but then the client was "Waiting for >> files from the server....." >> >> People here are complaining about TSM and that the restores takes long time >> and it's hard to defend it when the restore takes so long... >> > > -- > > Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind regards, > > Remco Post
