It's late in the day, but my 2c here is to add that it's not always necessary in Windows to use separate drive letters for LUNs - it's possible to 'mount' a volume under a directory rather than eating letters. This would appear to be a much more scalable approach - however, the difficulty as we discovered is that under some operations (e.g. format/restore the db) drive space is calculated based on the letter, even though there is space available in the actual db directory - meaning incorrect calculations.
Just a warning - mounting volumes under a single letter and sub directories _should_ work fine but doesn't. I'm not sure about IBM support on that either. Lots of drive letters is the only way to go. > On 12/09/2012 11:30 AM, Prather, Wanda wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > > > DB2 on Windows, like on AIX, does his %full calculations based on > > the amount of space on the drives where the DB and logs are > > located, just like it would do the %full calculations based on the > > amount of space in an AIX filesystem.
