In the "Client-acceptor scheduler services versus the traditional scheduler Services" section on page 225 of the
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Windows Backup-Archive Clients Version 6.4 Installation and User's Guide It says "Generally, using the client acceptor daemon to manage the scheduler is the preferred method." David -----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Schneider, Jim Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 11:07 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DSMCAD deprecated?!? Nick, The 6.2 Windows Backup/Archive Installation and User's Guide, page 209, says dsmcad is the preferred scheduling method. Also, Tivoli Storage Manager traditional scheduler services "Requires higher use of system resources when idle" and "Restart the traditional scheduler periodically to free system resources previously used by system calls." The scheduler service has a memory leak. It is unlikely that DSMCAD is deprecated. Jim Schneider -----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Laflamme Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 9:28 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [ADSM-L] DSMCAD deprecated?!? A colleague insists that TSM service once told him that DSMCAD would be deprecated and that we need to convert to using the TSM Scheduler routinely. The TSM 6.3 client manuals, however, refer to both techniques as valid choices. Has anyone ever been told by IBM that DSMCAD had been or will be deprecated, either in general or in very specific cases? Alternately, can anyone point to current IBM recommendations in favor of DSMCAD? Thanks, Nick ********************************************************************** Information contained in this e-mail message and in any attachments thereto is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message, delete any copies held on your systems, notify the sender immediately, and refrain from using or disclosing all or any part of its content to any other person.
