> Updated the device class to refer to the second library?  The pools would
> remain associated with the device class, the (new|moved) drives would be
> defined to the new library, and the tapes would be checked out of the old
> library and checked into the new one (with the device class change in
> between).

This would work, but it would also change the library for the primary pool 
since they used the same device class which would complicate the migrations, 
especially if the libraries are in different locations.  

Ideally you would have every pool use a unique device class.  You can have 
multiple device classes point to the same library.

Regards, 
Shawn
________________________________
Shawn Drew




This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for 
the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error, 
please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord 
with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, 
is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the 
integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) 
not therefore be liable for the message if modified. Please note that certain 
functions and services for BNP Paribas may be performed by BNP Paribas RCC, Inc.

Reply via email to