I don't understand these points at all.

1) You can maintain Eclipse & AS support at the same time. Back when AS was 
actually unstable and Eclipse was actually more useful, I maintained both 
ant & gradle support in our project so that our team could use either. Keep 
the source structure as Eclipse expects it, and change the sourceSets in 
the gradle config to match. There are examples of this online. 

Of course, you will quickly find that all the power of Gradle is lost if 
you handcuff yourself to only features that also work under Ant. I made it 
such that you could build a debug build with Ant, but if you wanted the 
other build types, you had to use Gradle. That allowed the team to continue 
using the tools they wanted while we experimented with AS. Note that this 
was fall of 2013. Our team of 5 Android developers switched relatively soon 
their after, and we haven't looked back. I personally use the canary 
channel of AS, and I may have lost 2 business days to tools problems, out 
of hundreds and hundreds of days. The productivity gain has more than made 
up for it. New features may have issues, but generally speaking we're 
talking about issues with feature that didn't exist in Eclipse + ADT 
anyway, and that doesn't stop you from getting your work done as you had 
before.

There are very narrow use cases where AS doesn't have the support you need, 
but outside of native code the argument that "Android Studio is not ready 
for prime time" doesn't hold any water. 

2) Most libraries will work - with the exception of AAR - in Eclipse. 
However, I can tell you most of the people writing libs are using the 
modern tools.

3) Yes

4) ?

5) Module support under AS is way better than under Eclipse. It's trivial 
to add Java or Android library modules to the project and it works quite 
well. I have split my app into a few different modules and I'm quite happy 
with it. You can't necessarily flow the variants up to the libraries, but 
there wasn't even a mechanism for something like build variants in Ant, so 
I'm not sure I see how that is a knock on Gradle.


On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 at 1:10:34 AM UTC-5, Greg Macdonald wrote:
>
> Thanks, Kiran.  We've a long term Android guy on our team who is 
> experienced with eclipse & ant and our project is yet small; but, yes, I'm 
> concerned about switching and I sure don't want to get stuck in an 
> old-tools world once AS is working well enough and moving forward.
>
> So, what I hear from you in balance is:
> - if one goes back, we all go together
> - 3rd party libs may not be maintaining support for eclipse-centered tools
> - ADT support for eclipse may wane (yea, in keeping with comments by ADT 
> lead)
> - Binary repos (I'm thinking this isn't a big deal, isn't maven under 
> jcenter anyway?)
>
> BTW, we are also considering turning the project into one monolithic 
> project for now and breaking it up into sub-projects again when the tools 
> support it better, but it's hard to maintain discipline around hierarchical 
> order and separation in such a world.  Alas and alack.
>
> Thanks again, Kiran
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 8:17 PM, Kiran Rao <techie....@gmail.com 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> @Greg,
>>
>> I think reverting is more difficult because you will have to do 
>> everything manually. While there is a migration path (and tooling support) 
>> for "converting" your project from Eclipse to Android Studio, there is no 
>> support for the opposite.
>>
>> You will find documentation on how you can make some adjustments to the 
>> sourceSets in build.gradle such that the same project can be worked on from 
>> both AS and Eclipse + ADT - however in practice this doesn't work well (and 
>> I have tried this on a team of only two developers!)
>>
>> I have also found that of late, most open source libraries use the 
>> AS/Gradle structure. You could of course grab the dependencies as binaries, 
>> or better, use Maven with your Eclipse/ADT setup. But then again, several 
>> libraries are distributed as AARs and last time I checked, Eclipse/ADT had 
>> trouble consuming AARs (at least Eclipse/ADT without Maven plugins did).
>>
>> What I'm trying to arrive at is that reverting to Eclipse might imply 
>> reduced support going forward - both from the Tools team as well as from 
>> the community.
>>
>> On Wednesday, 11 February 2015 06:56:18 UTC+5:30, Greg Macdonald wrote:
>>>
>>> OK, I should add to 'factual', input that is useful.  I'm really not 
>>> interested in religious wars or 'tude.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Artem Zinnatullin <
>>> artem.zi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> nano + javac is better choice for your team.
>>>>
>>>> For what reason you want to use flavors in not app modules? Seems to be 
>>>> architect/design problem.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> P.S.
>>>>
>>>> Gradle is stable, working build tool, Android Gradle Plugin and Android 
>>>> Studio are stable too, just fix dependecies versions. I started to use 
>>>> them 
>>>> from first public releases and I even changed 3 companies after this.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I just can't understand why people use Ant in 2015, okay, you don't 
>>>> want to use Gradle, but there is Maven. It's just unwillingness to learn 
>>>> new things, and in my opinion — it's unprofessional.
>>>>
>>>> Learning new should not be hard, it should be fun and useful for 
>>>> yourself.
>>>>
>>>> Just start with small personal project with Android Studio and Gradle, 
>>>> when you'll feel comfortable with them, try to switch work project to 
>>>> Gradle + AS.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "adt-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to adt-dev+u...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "adt-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to adt-dev+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"adt-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to adt-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to