Isn't that your projection?
On Jul 2, 6:19 am, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: > UG might say he is callous. > > But he did send a message to everyone to be free. That itself is compassion. > > He may say he is callous. But he welcomed anyone who wanted to talk to him > to his house. > > He used to meet thousands of people all over the world. > > A callous uncompassionate brute will not do such things. > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 7:20 AM, Kuber Technologies < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > Questioner: Is a person in the natural state compassionate? > > > U.G. Krishnamurti: That is your projection; they are callous, indifferent, > > unconcerned. 'Compassion' is one of the gimmicks of the 'holy business', > > sales talk. Do you think this individual is conscious that he is full of > > compassion? If he is, it is not compassion. > > > ------------ > > > UG would not have know compassion even if it reared up and bit his natural > > ass. > > > The typical connotation of the term "compassion" is someone being > > compassionate( in whatever manner) to someone who needs to be > > compassionated. > > > Whether the natural state or the unnatural state(there being really no > > such distinction)... > > > ..there are no entities involved ......where...... as a nuance of > > existing.... the flavour is of compassion, empathy, enmity or > > indifference. > > > That is to say......it is not that when some esoteric exalted state > > ofsagacity has happened...... only after that event.........there is no > > entity involved, there is no separation involved. > > > Non-entitification, non-separation, is the case, whether in the > > particularmilieu... > > > ... a sage (as held by the audience to be a sage) speaks to a > > seeker......or > > two warring nations threaten to obliterate the other .....in the name of > > democracy or in the name of Allah. > > > Whether it is seen to be acts of compassion or genocide...... > > > .....it is always the Duet of One. > > > In this Duet of One......compassion or empathy......is akin the rushingof > > the hand to cup the bleeding toe and ease the pain, when the toe got > > stubbed. > > > The compassionate hand does not see itself separate to the > > bleeding/painful toe. > > > Nor does it see itself as the same. > > > The ideation of separation or the ideation of non-separation...... > > > .....both are meaningless, irrelevant in the immediacy of the actioning. > > > Even the term "immediacy" is misleading for it suggests that there are > > some actions which are spontaneous and some which are delayed in > > time......being affected by deliberation, pondering, thinking etc etc. > > > The deliberation is immediate, the pondering is immediate, the reflection > > is immediate and the physical actualization of all these immediate > > mentations......into an action or series of actions (if at all).......is > > also immediate. > > > When there is nothing which is not immediate........the term immediacy > > becomes superfluous. > > > That is why the apperception of Advaita is the immediate primordial mirth > > at the concept of both Dvait as well as Advait.
