People talking about last night's tv programmes and biscuits and chocolates
is boring.
They are all in their minds. Talking likes and dislikes. Pleasure and pain.
I am beyond all these and do not participate in such stupidity.
Especially when you get that over and over again for a year.
People are boring.


On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Mark Ty-Wharton
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Finding people fucking boring is not an emanation of positive energy mate
>
> Look again, people are utterly fascinating.
>
> What are they saying that you are not listening to (that you can't hear
> because it is drowned out by your inner dialogue about avoiding boring
> people?)
>
> Sent from an iPhone
>
> On 2 Jul 2010, at 16:33, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> *
> *Rodger, we don't really need to do anything.
> The presence of jnanis in the world will automatically uplift the spirit of
> people.
> I have several people in my workplace I don't talk to because I find them
> fucking boring and attention seekers. I hope they learn silence from me some
> day. But the chances are very low.
> Its just that we need to emanate positive energy in the world.
> A few of these people feed on other's positive energy and suck them like
> parasites.
> I found it very hard to deal with these negative types.
> They are like born predators, sucking on people's energies to survive.
> It becomes difficult in these situations because they have their huge ego's
> at stake.
> They decorate their bodies, they improve their language skills, they are
> masters at inane intellectual arguments. Sometimes negative types
> congregate into large flocks and do gossipping and bitching around.
> They want to spread around their frustrations of their unhappy lives.
> This is the unfortunate pattern of the formation of societies.
> This pattern can be only broken by a few.
> Politics is at the root of every social interaction.
> Hence I try not to have friends.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Rodger < <[email protected]>
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> These things are difficulties for you?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jul 2, 10:08 am, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > People are paranoid, schizophrenic and jealous. Sounds familiar ???
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Rodger <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > I find it interesting,RS,that it is difficult for you to spread your
>> > > love around.What is the difficulty,if I may ask?
>> >
>> > > On Jul 2, 9:31 am, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > *If you see the deepest core of your existence as the same in
>> everybody
>> > > > else, why would you go around killing others ?
>> > > > An enlightened person will value what he is.
>> > > > So he will value everyone else as himself.
>> > > > It is the beginning of true morality.
>> > > > Not for the sake of maintaining order in society or following the
>> laws
>> > > laid
>> > > > down by the government.
>> > > > It is just a natural way of being.
>> > > > Callousness of UG is also a projection.
>> > > > The Self is just peace.
>> > > > You want to be in solitude.
>> > > > To be left alone to yourself.
>> > > > Where is the projection here ?
>> > > > I would really like to go around and spread my love.
>> > > > But it is not an easy task.
>> > > > People have their daily routines and commitments.
>> > > > So there is no need to go around preaching.
>> > > > Just let them fuck themselves and suffer.
>> > > > I am an enlightened person and I have compassion.
>> > > > By compassion, I mean that there is no difference between me and
>> anyone
>> > > else
>> > > > at the level of the Self. *
>> >
>> > > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Marcus <[email protected]
>> >
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> > > > > .
>> >
>> > > > > Why does an action need to be distinguished as compassionate or
>> > > > > aggressive.  Who is the judge ?
>> >
>> > > > > When Hitler murdered all those people he thought he was being
>> > > > > compassionate toward the human gene-pool.
>> > > > > Compassion was it when the Romans throw the Christians to the
>> > > > > lions.
>> >
>> > > > > History has an endless string of real examples of our ability to
>> be
>> > > > > compassionate.
>> >
>> > > > > Compassion and aggression are simple labels within the essential
>> world
>> > > > > of dualistic illusions.   This means they no substance within this
>> > > > > illusion of reality.
>> >
>> > > > > Yet if someone chooses,  they can also rise above this our
>> illusion
>> > > > > and reconnect with the whole.   No enlightenment or awakening.
>>  Just a
>> > > > > true purity of being.
>> >
>> > > > > Such people realise.  Helping others,  giving and loving are just
>> the
>> > > > > best way to share this illusion.
>> > > > > What you judge as compassionate is simply common sense when truth
>> is
>> > > > > realised.
>> >
>> > > > > .
>> > > > > On 2 July, 12:19, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > > > UG might say he is callous.
>> >
>> > > > > > But he did send a message to everyone to be free. That itself is
>> > > > > compassion.
>> >
>> > > > > > He may say he is callous. But he welcomed anyone who wanted to
>> talk
>> > > to
>> > > > > him
>> > > > > > to his house.
>> >
>> > > > > > He used to meet thousands of people all over the world.
>> >
>> > > > > > A callous uncompassionate brute will not do such things.
>> >
>> > > > > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 7:20 AM, Kuber Technologies <
>> >
>> > > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > > > > Questioner: Is a person in the natural state compassionate?
>> >
>> > > > > > >  U.G. Krishnamurti: That is your projection; they are callous,
>> > > > > indifferent,
>> > > > > > > unconcerned. 'Compassion' is one of the gimmicks of the 'holy
>> > > > > business',
>> > > > > > > sales talk. Do you think this individual is conscious that he
>> is
>> > > full
>> > > > > of
>> > > > > > > compassion? If he is, it is not compassion.
>> >
>> > > > > > > ------------
>> >
>> > > > > > > UG  would not have know compassion even if it reared up and
>> bit his
>> > > > > natural
>> > > > > > > ass.
>> >
>> > > > > > >  The typical connotation of the term "compassion" is someone
>> being
>> > > > > > >  compassionate( in whatever manner) to someone who needs to be
>> > > > > > > compassionated.
>> >
>> > > > > > >  Whether the natural state or the unnatural state(there being
>> > > really no
>> > > > > > > such distinction)...
>> >
>> > > > > > >  ..there are no entities involved ......where...... as a
>> nuance of
>> > > > > > >  existing.... the flavour is of compassion, empathy, enmity or
>> > > > > > > indifference.
>> >
>> > > > > > >  That is to say......it is not that when some esoteric exalted
>> > > state
>> > > > > ofsagacity has  happened...... only after that event.........there
>> is
>> > > no
>> > > > > > >   entity involved, there is no separation involved.
>> >
>> > > > > > >  Non-entitification, non-separation, is the case, whether in
>> the
>> > > > > particularmilieu...
>> >
>> > > > > > >  ... a sage (as held by the audience to be a sage) speaks to a
>> > > > > seeker......or
>> > > > > > > two warring nations threaten to obliterate the other .....in
>> the
>> > > name
>> > > > > of
>> > > > > > > democracy or in the name of Allah.
>> >
>> > > > > > > Whether it is seen to be acts of compassion or genocide......
>> >
>> > > > > > >  .....it is always the Duet of One.
>> >
>> > > > > > >  In this Duet of One......compassion or empathy......is akin
>> the
>> > > > > rushingof the hand to cup the bleeding toe and ease the pain, when
>> the
>> > > toe
>> > > > > got
>> > > > > > >   stubbed.
>> >
>> > > > > > >  The compassionate hand does not see itself separate to the
>> > > > > > > bleeding/painful toe.
>> >
>> > > > > > >  Nor does it see itself as the same.
>> >
>> > > > > > >  The ideation of separation or the ideation of
>> non-separation......
>> >
>> > > > > > >  .....both are meaningless, irrelevant in the immediacy of the
>> > > > > actioning.
>> >
>> > > > > > >  Even the term "immediacy" is misleading for it suggests that
>> there
>> > > > >  are
>> > > > > > > some actions which are spontaneous and some which are delayed
>> in
>> > > > > time......being affected by deliberation, pondering, thinking etc
>> etc.
>> >
>> > > > > > >  The deliberation is immediate, the pondering is immediate,
>> the
>> > > > > reflection
>> > > > > > > is immediate and the physical actualization of all these
>> immediate
>> > > > > mentations......into an action or series of actions (if at
>> > > all).......is
>> > > > > > > also immediate.
>> >
>> > > > > > >  When there is nothing which is not immediate........the term
>> > > immediacy
>> > > > > > > becomes superfluous.
>> >
>> > > > > > >  That is why the apperception of Advaita is the immediate
>> > > primordial
>> > > > > mirth
>> > > > > > > at the concept of both Dvait as well as Advait.- Hide quoted
>> text -
>> >
>> > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>>
>
>

Reply via email to