When someone talks too much...blabbering on and on .relentlessly, it makes me leave their presence.
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 12:41 PM, roomsearching <[email protected]>wrote: > People talking about last night's tv programmes and biscuits and chocolates > is boring. > They are all in their minds. Talking likes and dislikes. Pleasure and pain. > > I am beyond all these and do not participate in such stupidity. > Especially when you get that over and over again for a year. > People are boring. > > > On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Mark Ty-Wharton <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> Finding people fucking boring is not an emanation of positive energy mate >> >> Look again, people are utterly fascinating. >> >> What are they saying that you are not listening to (that you can't hear >> because it is drowned out by your inner dialogue about avoiding boring >> people?) >> >> Sent from an iPhone >> >> On 2 Jul 2010, at 16:33, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> * >> *Rodger, we don't really need to do anything. >> The presence of jnanis in the world will automatically uplift the spirit >> of people. >> I have several people in my workplace I don't talk to because I find them >> fucking boring and attention seekers. I hope they learn silence from me some >> day. But the chances are very low. >> Its just that we need to emanate positive energy in the world. >> A few of these people feed on other's positive energy and suck them like >> parasites. >> I found it very hard to deal with these negative types. >> They are like born predators, sucking on people's energies to survive. >> It becomes difficult in these situations because they have their huge >> ego's at stake. >> They decorate their bodies, they improve their language skills, they are >> masters at inane intellectual arguments. Sometimes negative types >> congregate into large flocks and do gossipping and bitching around. >> They want to spread around their frustrations of their unhappy lives. >> This is the unfortunate pattern of the formation of societies. >> This pattern can be only broken by a few. >> Politics is at the root of every social interaction. >> Hence I try not to have friends. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Rodger < <[email protected]> >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> These things are difficulties for you? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jul 2, 10:08 am, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > People are paranoid, schizophrenic and jealous. Sounds familiar ??? >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Rodger <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > I find it interesting,RS,that it is difficult for you to spread your >>> > > love around.What is the difficulty,if I may ask? >>> > >>> > > On Jul 2, 9:31 am, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > *If you see the deepest core of your existence as the same in >>> everybody >>> > > > else, why would you go around killing others ? >>> > > > An enlightened person will value what he is. >>> > > > So he will value everyone else as himself. >>> > > > It is the beginning of true morality. >>> > > > Not for the sake of maintaining order in society or following the >>> laws >>> > > laid >>> > > > down by the government. >>> > > > It is just a natural way of being. >>> > > > Callousness of UG is also a projection. >>> > > > The Self is just peace. >>> > > > You want to be in solitude. >>> > > > To be left alone to yourself. >>> > > > Where is the projection here ? >>> > > > I would really like to go around and spread my love. >>> > > > But it is not an easy task. >>> > > > People have their daily routines and commitments. >>> > > > So there is no need to go around preaching. >>> > > > Just let them fuck themselves and suffer. >>> > > > I am an enlightened person and I have compassion. >>> > > > By compassion, I mean that there is no difference between me and >>> anyone >>> > > else >>> > > > at the level of the Self. * >>> > >>> > > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Marcus < >>> [email protected]> >>> > > wrote: >>> > >>> > > > > . >>> > >>> > > > > Why does an action need to be distinguished as compassionate or >>> > > > > aggressive. Who is the judge ? >>> > >>> > > > > When Hitler murdered all those people he thought he was being >>> > > > > compassionate toward the human gene-pool. >>> > > > > Compassion was it when the Romans throw the Christians to the >>> > > > > lions. >>> > >>> > > > > History has an endless string of real examples of our ability to >>> be >>> > > > > compassionate. >>> > >>> > > > > Compassion and aggression are simple labels within the essential >>> world >>> > > > > of dualistic illusions. This means they no substance within >>> this >>> > > > > illusion of reality. >>> > >>> > > > > Yet if someone chooses, they can also rise above this our >>> illusion >>> > > > > and reconnect with the whole. No enlightenment or awakening. >>> Just a >>> > > > > true purity of being. >>> > >>> > > > > Such people realise. Helping others, giving and loving are just >>> the >>> > > > > best way to share this illusion. >>> > > > > What you judge as compassionate is simply common sense when truth >>> is >>> > > > > realised. >>> > >>> > > > > . >>> > > > > On 2 July, 12:19, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > > > UG might say he is callous. >>> > >>> > > > > > But he did send a message to everyone to be free. That itself >>> is >>> > > > > compassion. >>> > >>> > > > > > He may say he is callous. But he welcomed anyone who wanted to >>> talk >>> > > to >>> > > > > him >>> > > > > > to his house. >>> > >>> > > > > > He used to meet thousands of people all over the world. >>> > >>> > > > > > A callous uncompassionate brute will not do such things. >>> > >>> > > > > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 7:20 AM, Kuber Technologies < >>> > >>> > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > > > > Questioner: Is a person in the natural state compassionate? >>> > >>> > > > > > > U.G. Krishnamurti: That is your projection; they are >>> callous, >>> > > > > indifferent, >>> > > > > > > unconcerned. 'Compassion' is one of the gimmicks of the 'holy >>> > > > > business', >>> > > > > > > sales talk. Do you think this individual is conscious that he >>> is >>> > > full >>> > > > > of >>> > > > > > > compassion? If he is, it is not compassion. >>> > >>> > > > > > > ------------ >>> > >>> > > > > > > UG would not have know compassion even if it reared up and >>> bit his >>> > > > > natural >>> > > > > > > ass. >>> > >>> > > > > > > The typical connotation of the term "compassion" is someone >>> being >>> > > > > > > compassionate( in whatever manner) to someone who needs to >>> be >>> > > > > > > compassionated. >>> > >>> > > > > > > Whether the natural state or the unnatural state(there being >>> > > really no >>> > > > > > > such distinction)... >>> > >>> > > > > > > ..there are no entities involved ......where...... as a >>> nuance of >>> > > > > > > existing.... the flavour is of compassion, empathy, enmity >>> or >>> > > > > > > indifference. >>> > >>> > > > > > > That is to say......it is not that when some esoteric >>> exalted >>> > > state >>> > > > > ofsagacity has happened...... only after that >>> event.........there is >>> > > no >>> > > > > > > entity involved, there is no separation involved. >>> > >>> > > > > > > Non-entitification, non-separation, is the case, whether in >>> the >>> > > > > particularmilieu... >>> > >>> > > > > > > ... a sage (as held by the audience to be a sage) speaks to >>> a >>> > > > > seeker......or >>> > > > > > > two warring nations threaten to obliterate the other .....in >>> the >>> > > name >>> > > > > of >>> > > > > > > democracy or in the name of Allah. >>> > >>> > > > > > > Whether it is seen to be acts of compassion or genocide...... >>> > >>> > > > > > > .....it is always the Duet of One. >>> > >>> > > > > > > In this Duet of One......compassion or empathy......is akin >>> the >>> > > > > rushingof the hand to cup the bleeding toe and ease the pain, >>> when the >>> > > toe >>> > > > > got >>> > > > > > > stubbed. >>> > >>> > > > > > > The compassionate hand does not see itself separate to the >>> > > > > > > bleeding/painful toe. >>> > >>> > > > > > > Nor does it see itself as the same. >>> > >>> > > > > > > The ideation of separation or the ideation of >>> non-separation...... >>> > >>> > > > > > > .....both are meaningless, irrelevant in the immediacy of >>> the >>> > > > > actioning. >>> > >>> > > > > > > Even the term "immediacy" is misleading for it suggests that >>> there >>> > > > > are >>> > > > > > > some actions which are spontaneous and some which are delayed >>> in >>> > > > > time......being affected by deliberation, pondering, thinking etc >>> etc. >>> > >>> > > > > > > The deliberation is immediate, the pondering is immediate, >>> the >>> > > > > reflection >>> > > > > > > is immediate and the physical actualization of all these >>> immediate >>> > > > > mentations......into an action or series of actions (if at >>> > > all).......is >>> > > > > > > also immediate. >>> > >>> > > > > > > When there is nothing which is not immediate........the term >>> > > immediacy >>> > > > > > > becomes superfluous. >>> > >>> > > > > > > That is why the apperception of Advaita is the immediate >>> > > primordial >>> > > > > mirth >>> > > > > > > at the concept of both Dvait as well as Advait.- Hide quoted >>> text - >>> > >>> > > > > > - Show quoted text - >>> >> >> >
