well, its better than jerking off to your wife. On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Rodger <[email protected]> wrote:
> Now that you mention it,he has used the term jerking off quite a bit. > To dead chickens,maybe? > And then he eats them? > Maybe that is his idea of a blissburger. > To each his own....one man's shit is another man's fertilizer,as > Marcus says. > :) > > > > > On Jul 27, 9:07 am, [email protected] wrote: > > RS doesn't know what is a wife, he just uses his sick imagination > > Sent via BlackBerry from Vodafone > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Rodger <[email protected]> > > > > Sender: [email protected] > > Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:05:45 > > To: Advaita-Zen<[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: Why not? > > > > Who is 'we'...you got a mouse in your pocket? > > > > How do you know what my wife says? > > (Did Godszen tell you to say that?) > > > > On Jul 27, 8:42 am, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: > > > We didn't tell you "Dont do this ...don't do that". Its your wife who > is > > > saying that. > > > > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 8:12 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Don't entertain thoughts and concepts. > > > > Why not? > > > > > > Don't do this...don't do that... > > > > Why not? > > > > > > Isn't it all just a play of consciousness that goes on spontaneously? > > > > > > Why should I behave, think, believe in a certain way? > > > > > > I'll tell you why. > > > > It is because you want something you have to follow > > > > 'instructions'/'orders', right? > > > > > > If you transcend wanting (in spiritual matters) you have no > constrains in > > > > what to do or not do. > > > > > > What do I want? How will I achieve that? Bla bla > > > > > > Of course there is something we all want, it is the state of > permanent > > > > absence of suffering, pain... > > > > So we 'follow instructions' of gurus. But if I (for example) don't > care > > > > about 'getting' that, I can do/think.. whatever I want. > > > > I can't prevent the arisal of suffering anyway. Can you? > > > > > > Ps. I don't believe that shit about that the owner of suffering > disappears, > > > > because the 'I' also arises the same way suffering does. No way of > > > > preventing that. > > > > Sent via BlackBerry from Vodafone >
