There are no lines to draw.
Either you are in reality or in illusion.
There is nothing like " I will live 50% of the day in reality and 50% in
illusion".
In your case, you are 100% in illusion which is why you are seeing a
vibrator in people's butts.
That is because you have a vibrator in your own butt which makes you think
that everyone is doing the same.


On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Rodger <[email protected]> wrote:

> 'Once the Kundalini is activated'...
>
> Once more you have drawn a line,dumb shit.
> Your whole existence never was not spiritual.
> Kundalini never was inactive.
>
> That buzzing sensation in your body is just your vibrator in your
> butt.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Aug 2, 11:10 am, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Exactly Mark. You got the point.
> > Once the Kundalini is activated, your whole existence becomes spiritual.
> > The bliss of consciousness gives a buzzing sensation in your body all
> day.
> > When your balls are being crushed by the Kundalini, such questions do not
> > arise - spiritual and non-spiritual.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Mark Ty-Wharton <
> [email protected]>wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > What about me?
> >
> > > It is when I give up that sentiment!
> >
> > > How can any of you say this is a spiritual forum and then back in the
> real
> > > world...
> >
> > > The real world IS the spiritual forum
> >
> > > These words are but a tiny part of a whole way of being
> >
> > > Mark
> >
> > > Sent from an iPhone
> >
> > > On 2 Aug 2010, at 12:35, Mahakali <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > Hi everyone
> >
> > > > we all know the difference between spiritual and non-spiritual. We
> > > > have gone through endless debates and discussions on spirituality.
> >
> > > > But, in real life, where do you draw the line between what is
> > > > spiritual and what is non-spiritual? When or where do you see the
> > > > spiritual emerging from a non-spiritual experience of viceversa?
> >
> > > > To me, it is seen in my reactions and attitude towards life i.e. when
> > > > my ego does not take ownership of facts and events and stories being
> > > > built upon it have been abandoned. It is simply what it is without
> any
> > > > (mental or intellectual) story or attribute being added to it.
> >
> > > > What about you?
> >
> > > > Kali
>

Reply via email to