I've been on a Yoohoo kick the past few days, but I don't think they are the same.
On Aug 23, 9:51 am, Marcus <[email protected]> wrote: > . > > Agreed. But who is Youwho ?? > > Why do you offer history on Youwho ?? > > . > > On 23 Aug, 15:34, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Low vibrational beings do not affect enlightened people. > > That is the whole point of enlightenment. You are eternal. > > Nothing can fuck with your soul anymore. > > Trauma is just a memory. It depends on you how you view it. > > You could be beaten to a pulp by a lynch mob. > > But that memory has no real staying power when you know your eternal state. > > The mind and body suffer. But not you. > > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Marcus <[email protected]> wrote: > > > . > > > > Okay and agreed ………changing your name is easer then changing your > > > asshole. This is perhaps more controversial then I surmised. > > > I sense a bitter wind from the past on a very low vibration. > > > Interesting how popular past trauma’s remain. > > > > So ……….. who is Youwho ??? > > > > Lets try a test …………. How long is a piece of string ???? > > > > Who can answer this …. You ? > > > > . > > > > On 23 Aug, 14:29, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Youwho is the cunt who raised his evil head a few months ago making > > > comments > > > > about me. > > > > Now he is here to tell Marko not to listen to people here and take > > > > everything with a grain of salt. > > > > Nevertheless, he offers plenty of advice. > > > > And whenever I used the word "I", he would say there is no "I" after > > > > enlightenment and since, I used it, I have a huge ego. > > > > Changing a name does not change your email address - asshole. > > > > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Marcus <[email protected] > > > >wrote: > > > > > > . > > > > > > Is Youwho and roomsearching the same sentient being ??? > > > > > > If so then okey, Like the many reincarnations of the Dali lama > > > > > different manes but the same person. > > > > > > Did I get this right …………… ??? > > > > > > . > > > > > > On Aug 23, 10:35 am, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > its not a new person. Its the same old guy with a new name. > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Marcus <[email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > Welcome Youwho, > > > > > > > It is always a pleasure to share words with a new reflection. > > > Enjoy > > > > > > > the ride. Welcome. > > > > > > > > "when the consciousness goes, you prevail" > > > > > > > “All this knowledge has dawned on me,” > > > > > > > > Yes, the immortal spirit that has no beginning or end. That > > > > > > > intangible force which enables sentience. We all have it. > > > > > > > > “We” all loose it or at least the human ego looses it. Our > > > > > > > speculations of “I am” are confined to our current sentient > > > > > > > blend > > > of > > > > > > > mortal and immortal forces. > > > > > > > > “you prevail - you always are - as the Absolute.” > > > > > > > > It’s not you who prevails, this you to which you refer is only a > > > > > > > temporary balancing-act of circumstance. This temporary state > > > > > > > does > > > > > > > not prevail. But that force within you that enables conscious > > > > > > > awareness, that force which enables your ability to sate “I am” > > > is > > > > > > > a universal force and this does prevail and is absolute. > > > > > > > > You-me-us are just reflections on the surface of a very busy pond. > > > > > > > > Hence in this moment only, We are everything and nothing at the > > > same > > > > > > > time ………………… > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > On Aug 23, 8:39 am, "YouWho?" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Even when the consciousness goes, you prevail - you always are - > > > > > > > > as the Absolute. As the consciousness you are everything; > > > whatever > > > > > is, > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > you. All this knowledge has dawned on me, I am not that > > > knowledge. > > > > > > > > The knowledge "I Am," and all its manifestations, are > > > > > > > > understood. > > > In > > > > > > > > understanding, I am not That.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -
