Ah sorry, I thought we were talking about oneness! On 4 December 2010 18:58, Marcus <[email protected]> wrote:
> . > > Yes …......... to appease that human urge to gratify the illogical > sense of the much bigger picture than the simple self. An inner voice > which whispers unceasingly of consciousness beyond day to day mundane > existence. We are no different to them. Something intangible drives > these men. A force which, like love and beauty has no known physical > manifestation other than the self. > > Why should we try to label it ??? …...... is it not enough that > surly in the human mind it exists just as love and beauty. > > Call it imagination, why not. Imagination created all that man has > achieved. > > > . > > On Dec 4, 12:14 pm, Marko Gregoric <[email protected]> wrote: > > Men built temples to satisfy their urge to express their creativity and > for > > the urge of being proud having done something big/important/beutiful..... > > > > 2010/12/4 Marcus <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > Riddle …............. > > > > > It is not God is love. Because love is God. > > > > > It is not that big is small. Because small is big. (infinity has no > > > divide) > > > > > Beauty can only exist in the eye of a holder. > > > > > It is not that “I am” . Because I am that I am. That I say this > > > now knowingly of myself is enough. > > > > > In your darkness visible of silent meditated, when the Great God > > > Thoth (thought) leaves you in peace. Only then can you say. Of true > > > self I know. > > > > > Why did men build temples …....... ???? …...... for what ….. ???. > > > > > . > > > > > On Dec 3, 3:16 pm, Mark Ty-Wharton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > And yes to answer your question directly, it is, was and will be (as > > > declared) > > > > > > For you perhaps, all that is declaring a part of it's ever changing > form > > > as Mark Ty-Wharton :-) > > > > > > Sent from an iPhone > > > > > > On 3 Dec 2010, at 05:17, godszen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Mark Ty-Wharton wrote: > > > > >> Yes, there is a collection of atoms in a physical form..... > > > > > > > is that you, or any part of you?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - -- *mark ty wharton** * *†µ€_©0Nç∑P†_Hµß* <http://groups.google.co.uk/group/concept_hub> _____________________________________________________ ______________________________________ The contents of this email and the context of the message and any attachments are intended for the recipient only. You may not copy, or redistribute the contents of this email without the express, written consent of the author. *mark ty-wharton is a composer, philosophical speaker and writer* *http://mark.ty-wharton.com @mark_tywharton <http://twitter.com/mark_tywharton>*
