<That which admits neither time, nor admits the absence of time..
..has no performing stage to boogie the wiggle. >

A profound statement.

That is exactly "where I was" or "where I wasn't" for lack of a better
terms, the other night.

Yes Mark, let it be, it just is......... Your right.
Grasping for a concept is futile and "strengthens the chains", if you
will.

Thanks, That is why I love this group.
I can usually find the answers, I'm looking for.
Still no word from Rodger?
Perhaps he no longer has a stage to perform on.


On Dec 6, 11:06 am, Mark Ty-Wharton <[email protected]> wrote:
> Bob;
>
> It arises when it arises.
>
> Wishing to get back to that place is a concept, because your next awareness
> could easily be tainted by trying to make it as good as the last etc.
>
> Just enjoy awareness, that feeling will return and when it does don't try to
> hold it or own it.
>
> It just IS.
>
> Let it be.
>
> There are no REAL steps.
>
> Just get with it.
>
> What are you doing RIGHT NOW?
>
> On 6 December 2010 04:12, Bob1357 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > The other night I found my perspective or perception flipping from one
> > (truth) to the other (the usual drama entangled standard woven mess).
> > I do not know why this is. When I say truth, I mean seeing everything
> > with perfect clarity and seeing the truth or non truth in everything.
> > When this happens I seem to dissipate, Only awareness in an empty
> > space. Not that the space is empty of people or things, but somehow
> > empty none the less. While in this empty space there was a feeling of
> > complete safety and also the feeling that there was literally nothing
> > that I could not do or know for that matter. This is a good feeling.
> > We were out drinking and maybe this has something to do with it. It is
> > a perspective that I would like to have back and hold onto
> > permanently, unfortunately I do not know how to turn it off or on. Any
> > comments?
>
> --
> *mark ty wharton**
> * *†µ€_©0Nç∑P†_Hµß* <http://groups.google.co.uk/group/concept_hub>
> _____________________________________________________
> ______________________________________
> The contents of this email and the context of the message and any
> attachments are intended for the recipient only.
> You may not copy, or redistribute the contents of this email without the
> express, written consent of the author.
>
> *mark ty-wharton is a composer, philosophical speaker and writer*
> *http://mark.ty-wharton.com
> @mark_tywharton <http://twitter.com/mark_tywharton>*

Reply via email to