The COM based one uses a newer more efficient engne which for SOME files are more efficient. You can find some stuff on the Microsoft web site on it. There recommendation is to stick with the class unless you see big differences for your files.
Ben -----Original Message----- From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Axel Heitland Sent: Thursday, 11 July 2002 5:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Slow XSLT.transform Hi all, are there any known performance issues with the XslTransform class?! We've done some measurements with the MSXML-COM-Implementation and XslTransform and got some very disappointing results - both got the input and produced the same output, but the COM-based program took 0.3 sec whereas the XslTransform took 30 sec - that what I call a difference ;-) Any pointers? Axel You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com. You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
