Serge,

It might be good idea to port ILASM to C#... ;-)

Regards,
Jeroen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Serge Lidin
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 18:05
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] ILASM behaves differently on
> Win2K and WinXP
>
>
> The bug is of the most trivial nature: an uninitialized
> pointer. Hence, the behavior is generally random and depends
> on the memory layout and initialization, which differs from
> one OS to another. This bug is fixed in version 1.1.
>
> Thanks,
> Serge
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Caven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 7:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] ILASM behaves differently on Win2K and
> WinXP
>
>
> Thanks, Serge,
>
> I noticed that sentence soon after I had posted my question ... :-)
>
> I can live with stating the export name explicitly, but if
> it's just a bug
> in ILASM, then what is it about WinXP that exposes it?
>
> Andy,
> It's not the loader (I think) because copying the DLL from
> WinXP to Win2K
> does not correct the problem.
>
> Thanks again,
> -- Peter
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 09:40:07 -0700, Serge Lidin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >I am afraid this has nothing to do with Win2K/WinXP. It's a
> bug in version
> 1.0 of ILASM: you need to specify the export alias even if
> it's the same as
> the name of the method. The book states it explicitly: "It is
> necessary to
> specify <export name> even if the method is exported under
> its own name".
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Serge
>
> You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive,
> unsubscribe from Advanced DOTNET, or
> subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
>
> You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive,
> unsubscribe from Advanced DOTNET, or
> subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
>

You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced 
DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.

Reply via email to