I just tested copying/pasting the code from the forum, and it works just fine for me... Maybe the code didn't download fully to the browser? It is on the long side at 19KB. I also am not sure, but there could possibly be different versions of the program with a different schema. I didn't have any problems with any of the QuickCode's in the forum and I'm using the latest version (as of last Friday).
--Oren > -----Original Message----- > From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jordan E. Terrell > Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 2:28 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Strongly-Typed DataSets vs. Strongly-Typed Collections > > When I try to paste the QuickCode into the editor it comes back with an > "Invalid Clipboard Data" error. Did it get posted to the forum > correctly? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Oren Novotny > Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 12:54 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Strongly-Typed DataSets vs. > Strongly-Typed Collections > > Using Mark's code, I combined it with an existing QuickCode template for > a strongly-typed collection derived from CollectionBase and posted it to > the forum[1]. The template also generates the code to put in the > collection's type-class. > > So now to create a collection w/IBindingList all you need to do is (with > the free QuickCode.NET add-in): > > collection Foo <Alt-Q> > > Since now it's easy to make/use a collection for databinding, I guess > most of the reasons for using a dataset are eliminated. > > > [1] http://quickcode.dvxp.com/ > > --Oren > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ian Griffiths > > Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 8:45 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Strongly-Typed DataSets vs. Strongly-Typed Collections > > > > Oren Novotny wrote: > > > I guess part of what I was wondering was if it would be worth > > > the effort to implement IBindingList for a collection instead of > > > using the implementation provided with a dataset. I always > > > thought that a dataset seemed overkill for just binding a bunch > > > of objects to a listbox, but then I found it useless if I wanted to > > > add/remove items from the listbox. > > > > IBindingList isn't trivial to implement, but it's also not all that > hard. > > (There's just quite a lot of it...) Mark Boulter posted an > implementation > > here: > > > > http://discuss.develop.com/archives/wa.exe?A2=ind0208A&L=DOTNET- > > CLR&P=R15129 > > &I=-3 > > > > But I would hesistate to describe doing this as being simpler than > using a > > dataset. (A collection that implements IBindingList like this is > > undoubtedly a simpler thing than a DataSet, but DataSet has the > advantage > > of > > already being in the framework, which makes *using* it simpler... You > > don't > > have to write it first!) > > > > > > -- > > Ian Griffiths > > DevelopMentor > > > > You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe > from > > Advanced DOTNET, or > > subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com. > > You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from > Advanced DOTNET, or > subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com. > > You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from > Advanced DOTNET, or > subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com. You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
