Thanks for the suggestions. I'll try them out. It seems unavoidable, that I'll have to replicate the legacy API in a wrapper class of some sort.
- [ADVANCED-DOTNET] access to a legacy DLL with a C++ AP... Steve Clark
- Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] access to a legacy DLL with... Trey Nash
- Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] access to a legacy DLL with... Fouquet, Christophe
- Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] access to a legacy DLL with... Steve Clark
- Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] access to a legacy DLL ... Philip Nelson
