> I had seen that, but wasn't sure that it was applicable to my > question. > It's good to know that it is. Now for the difficult part of convincing > myself that I want to use private data :-) >
To back up one level, why do you want to take a URL as input and get your hands on the associated object reference that incoming remote method calls would be dispatched against? Maybe there's an alternative design to solve your problem that wouldn't paint you into a corner that requires the use of reflection against private members to get out of... -Mike DevelopMentor http://staff.develop.com/woodring
