Yes, I see now. I was getting confused by the Remoting uri, thinking that
Remoting somehow resolved the endpoint within the machine.

No, not IPC, I'm building a middle tier for a distributed architecture in a
large company. We have many internal apps, internal and external SOAP users.
Migrating from DCOM/VB6.

But on the subject of IPC: what's the best way to have a service - say, an
order service to accept customer orders and insert into a db - to accept
calls both as a web service OR be called from another service on that box
(such as a fa�ade)? I certainly don't want to incur the overhead of calling
to another Web Service  when I'm already on the same server (expensive XML
serialization, SOAP formatting). Should I create a separate assembly that
actually does the work that can be called from a Web Service AND/OR via
Remoting (tcp/binary) from another fa�ade on that same box? That means my
actual Web Service isn't doing anything except accepting the call, turning
around and calling this assembly. This seems to make sense, but I�m new to
Remoting so I'm looking for ideas. One thing that's complicating things for
me is that I'm very interested in Indigo from what I've seen, but it's all
based on web services, and I don't know if using this approach would make it
extremely difficult to migrate to it.

Thanks.

Andy Smith


-----Original Message-----
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shawn A. Van Ness
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 12:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Multiple Ports and Remoting

> Is it only for that process?

Yes, of course.  Else, how else would your computer know what to do with an
incoming TCP/IP connection request for port 8080?  Query all the processes
running on the machine to see which are interested?  Pick one at random to
handle it?  No, of course only one process can be allowed to listen on a
port at any one time.

May we ask what your application is?  Sounds like IPC... I strongly advise
against the use of TCP/IP for IPC, for a number of reasons.  Foremost (aside
from a host of security issues, which may or may not apply in your case) is
what I suspect you're just running into -- the extremely limited space of
endpoints (port numbers) prevents us from declaring one at design-time --
forces us to grab one at deployment- or run-time, and then "publish" it to
would-be clients, out of band, somehow.

Of course, there are about a dozen possible ways to handle that (from
app.config to creative use of registry keys), but they're all about as much
trouble as just p/invoking the classic Win32 IPC mechanisms -- named-pipes,
postmessage, or shared-memory -- which'd give you a totally secure solution
with an ultra-wide space of endpoints, to boot.

Cheers,
-Shawn
http://www.windojitsu.com/


-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 13:16
Subject: Multiple Ports and Remoting

When I do this:

        TcpServerChannel channel = new TcpServerChannel(8080);

Is it only for that process? That is, can/should other processes on the same
machine also receive on 8080? Or does each process have to have its own
port? I'm going to have many processes on a single machine (eventually) and
I'm unclear on how this works. I get an error on my 2nd process when I try
to create a channel with the same port number, so I assume that a port is
for one machine/one process only, but I want to make sure I understand.

Thanks.

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentorR  http://www.develop.com Some .NET
courses you may be interested in:

NEW! Guerrilla ASP.NET, 17 May 2004, in Los Angeles
http://www.develop.com/courses/gaspdotnetls

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor.  http://www.develop.com Some .NET
courses you may be interested in:

NEW! Guerrilla ASP.NET, 17 May 2004, in Los Angeles
http://www.develop.com/courses/gaspdotnetls

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor�  http://www.develop.com
Some .NET courses you may be interested in:

NEW! Guerrilla ASP.NET, 17 May 2004, in Los Angeles
http://www.develop.com/courses/gaspdotnetls

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com

Reply via email to