Sorry to keep pestering you on this, but I have a great interest in this
topic and I'm unfamiliar with these techniques:

What's a "publisher policy file"?

What's an "app level binding redirect"?

This sounds exactly like something I'd like to have, but I haven't run
across this. Is this some functionality of the CLR? If you could point me
in the general direction of where to research, I'd really appreciate it.

Thanks again.

Andy

---------------------------------------------------------------------

On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:43:55 -0400, Bob Provencher
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Sorry - We have a convention that we increment the build number when
>introducing a non-interface breaking change.
>
>With every release we build a publisher policy file.  For a release, for
>example 1.0.0.1000, the publisher policy file says redirect all release
>references in the range 1.0.0.X to the latest build, 1.0.0.1000.  When
>we introduce a change, now at version 1.0.0.1001 we deploy a new
>publisher policy file redirecting all references to that new version.
>
>If we do not want a specific app referencing a specific version to use
>the new version, we using app level binding redirects and DO NOT deploy
>the publisher policy file.  Binding redirects can be at the machine
>level or app level in the proper .config file.  They allow you to
>control for a specific app which specific version of each assembly to
>use.
>
>When we introduce an interface breaking change we increment the release
>mod level, in the above example that would be 1.0.1.0000.  None of our
>redirects will ever redirect between mod levels, only build levels.
>
>I *think* you can combine publisher policy with binding redirects.  In
>that case you would use the binding redirects to specify the release you
>are after, and the policy to direct to the latest build level.  But we
>aren't currently doing this so you'd have to experiment a little.
>
>Bob Provencher
>VP Software Development
>Chief Architect
>Incurrent
>............................
>900 Lanidex Plaza
>Parsippany, NJ 07054
>973.781.9012    XT 216
>908.625.6061 (Cell)
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Andy Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 10:19 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bob Provencher
>Subject: Re: Best Practices: Sharing business assemblies, the GAC,
>deployment and component versioning
>
>
>Can you explain what you mean by this?
>
>"...we increment the lowest build number and deploy a publisher policy
>file and/or binding redirects."
>
>Thanks.
>
>
>On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:01:40 -0400, Bob Provencher
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Bill Bassler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 8:43 AM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Best Practices: Sharing business assemblies,
>
>>the GAC, deployment and component versioning
>>
>>>> While GAC deployment made making inter-component and client
>>referencing easier, it of course forces strict versioning between
>>components and referencing and clients that use them. <<
>>
>>When introducing a non interface breaking change, we increment the
>>lowest build number and deploy a publisher policy file and/or binding
>>redirects.  For an interface breaking change all dependent assemblies
>>must be relinked and redeployed.
>>
>>Bob Provencher
>>VP Software Development
>>Chief Architect
>>Incurrent
>>............................
>>900 Lanidex Plaza
>>Parsippany, NJ 07054
>>973.781.9012    XT 216
>>908.625.6061 (Cell)
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>===================================
>>This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r)  http://www.develop.com Some
>.NET
>>courses you may be interested in:
>>
>>NEW! Guerrilla ASP.NET, 17 May 2004, in Los Angeles
>>http://www.develop.com/courses/gaspdotnetls
>>
>>View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
>>http://discuss.develop.com
>
>===================================
>This list is hosted by DevelopMentor�  http://www.develop.com
>Some .NET courses you may be interested in:
>
>NEW! Guerrilla ASP.NET, 17 May 2004, in Los Angeles
>http://www.develop.com/courses/gaspdotnetls
>
>View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
http://discuss.develop.com

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor�  http://www.develop.com
Some .NET courses you may be interested in:

NEW! Guerrilla ASP.NET, 17 May 2004, in Los Angeles
http://www.develop.com/courses/gaspdotnetls

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com

Reply via email to