Good :) So MC++ is the best .NET language ;) Cheers, Stoyan
-----Original Message----- From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bogdan Lachendro Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 5:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] const modifier in method parameter - managed c++ On 2004-11-19 15:51, Stoyan Damov wrote: > I think that my previous post could answer the question - so you can > consume both methods from a managed C++ client? If the IL is same for > both methods, then at least Microsoft should have added a > HideFromNonMcppCompilers (or something like this) to the method as > well, so non-MC++ clients cannot see the "offending" method. I have changed the code to : public __gc class MyClass { public: void foo(MyClass* const a) { System::Console::WriteLine("void foo(MyClass* const a)"); } void foo(const MyClass* a) { System::Console::WriteLine("void foo(const MyClass* a)"); } void boo() { const MyClass* myClass; this->foo(myClass); } void boo1() { MyClass* const myClass = 0; this->foo(myClass); } }; Then created C# executable with main: MyClass a = new MyClass(); a.boo(); a.boo1(); The output is: void foo(const MyClass* a) void foo(MyClass* const a) The IL code for those methods differ only by method tokens. B. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bogdan > Lachendro > Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 4:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] const modifier in method parameter - > managed c++ > > > On 2004-11-19 15:41, Stoyan Damov wrote: > >>Are you new to .NET? AFAIK no .NET-enabled language except C++ >>supports object const-ness. It is interesting though that you managed >>to compile the class with the MC++. In .NET (as opposed to C++, where >>const rules) you'll have to learn to deal with readonly (initonly) >>fields, get/set properties, read-only collections (or similar >>patterns) to prevent object clients to modify the instance, etc., etc. > > >>IMHO losing const is a drawback but this has been discussed many times > > >>and I don't want to start any religious wars. > > > Maybe I wasn't clear enough. Or perhaps I should make the question > different. I wonder why the MC++ compiler allows the constructs as > below and generates the same IL code for both of the methods. > > Regards, > Bogdan > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bogdan >>Lachendro >>Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 4:11 PM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] const modifier in method parameter - >>managed >>c++ >> >> >>Hi, >> >>Lets say I have a class: >> >> public __gc class MyClass >> { >> public: >> >> void foo(MyClass* const a) >> { >> } >> >> void foo(const MyClass* a) >> { >> } >> }; >> >>Why is the IL code generated by MVC++ the same for both those methods? > > >>Is there any way to use such method in C# code? Currently I have: >> >>e:\classlibrary1\class1.cs(34,13): error CS0121: The call is ambiguous > > >>between the following methods or properties: >>'ManagedClass.MyClass.foo(ManagedClass.MyClass)' and >>'ManagedClass.MyClass.foo(ManagedClass.MyClass)' >> >>Thanks, >> >>Regards, >>Bogdan >> >>=================================== >>This list is hosted by DevelopMentorŽ http://www.develop.com Some >>.NET courses you may be interested in: >> >>Essential .NET: building applications and components with C# November >>29 >>- December 3, in Los Angeles http://www.develop.com/courses/edotnet >> >>View archives and manage your subscription(s) at >>http://discuss.develop.com >> >>=================================== >>This list is hosted by DevelopMentorŽ http://www.develop.com Some >>.NET courses you may be interested in: >> >>Essential .NET: building applications and components with C# November >>29 - December 3, in Los Angeles http://www.develop.com/courses/edotnet >> >>View archives and manage your subscription(s) at >>http://discuss.develop.com >> >> > > > > -- > Bogdan Lachendro mailto:lachu(at)poczta.fm > http://www.the.king.of.pl TEL +48606318657 UIN 66844735 GG 1469796 > A wise man changes his mind, a fool never will... > > =================================== > This list is hosted by DevelopMentorŽ http://www.develop.com Some > .NET courses you may be interested in: > > Essential .NET: building applications and components with C# November > 29 > - December 3, in Los Angeles http://www.develop.com/courses/edotnet > > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at > http://discuss.develop.com > > =================================== > This list is hosted by DevelopMentorŽ http://www.develop.com Some > .NET courses you may be interested in: > > Essential .NET: building applications and components with C# November > 29 - December 3, in Los Angeles http://www.develop.com/courses/edotnet > > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at > http://discuss.develop.com > > -- Bogdan Lachendro mailto:lachu(at)poczta.fm http://www.the.king.of.pl TEL +48606318657 UIN 66844735 GG 1469796 A wise man changes his mind, a fool never will... =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentorŽ http://www.develop.com Some .NET courses you may be interested in: Essential .NET: building applications and components with C# November 29 - December 3, in Los Angeles http://www.develop.com/courses/edotnet View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentorŽ http://www.develop.com Some .NET courses you may be interested in: Essential .NET: building applications and components with C# November 29 - December 3, in Los Angeles http://www.develop.com/courses/edotnet View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
