hi,
I would like to know if it makes sense using EnterpriseServices and
System.Transaction together in Whidbey ?. I would like to use the
automatic promotion of a transaction(1RM) to distributed transaction(2N
RM) but still use the EnterpriseServices programming model.
public void ConfiguredComponent(.....)
{
try
{
using (TransactionScope ts = new TransactionScope()) <----
{
update db 1....using ado.net wish ado.net 2.0 would
detect how many RM's and promote the transaction to a dis. tx.
update db 2....using ado.net ......
ts.Consistent = true;
ContextUtil.SetComplete(); <----does this make sense
}
}
catch(.........)
{
ContextUtil.SetAbort() <----- nor does this
}
}
I would like the best of both programming models, but these two
programming models seems orthogonal to me.
I don't know if I made my self clear here....but yes I want Tim Ewald's
rule 6.5 to become obsolete :)
Cheers, @llan
===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor� http://www.develop.com
Some .NET courses you may be interested in:
Essential .NET: building applications and components with C#
November 29 - December 3, in Los Angeles
http://www.develop.com/courses/edotnet
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
