That's 25th Jan (pretend it was 1.0.2005.0125). On 5th Dec it will be 1.0.2005.1205.
At 01:10 AM 1/26/2005, Hewitt, Simon C. \(Contractor\) wrote >>....in the form <major>.<minor>.<yyyy>.<mmdd>. Today's build of my >product is "1.0.2005.125". > >So it that 25th January or (will it be) 5th December? :-) > >-----Original Message----- >From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shawn A. Van >Ness >Sent: 25 January 2005 17:25 >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Determing time when a assembly was built > > >> Don't you just love it when you get answers explaining exactly how to >> do the two things you specifically said you didn't want to do? :-) > >D'oh! Sorry, I missed that bullet item on the requirements list... > >What I do, in reality, is some combination of my advice and Ian's: I >encode the build date into my version bits, but I don't use the "*" >syntax. I have a little codegen tool which spits out human-readable >versions in the form <major>.<minor>.<yyyy>.<mmdd>. Today's build of my >product is "1.0.2005.125". >[snip] J. Merrill / Analytical Software Corp =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor� http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
