I would highly recommend moving to WSE3. It's worlds ahead of WSE2 and
has DIME support built in. In addition, the policy model is much cleaner
and it will upgrade to indigo.

Erick

-----Original Message-----
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Welborn
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 12:28 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Anyone have experience using DIME?

Hi Erick,

       Yes I am using WSE2 SP2 right now. What I was trying to do was
see if I could use DIME to transfer files from one client to another
client. Either passing through the webservice to a client or just
straight to the client.
Doesn't seem like I can unless you have some suggestions.

  Thanks for the reply,
         Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 1:45 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Anyone have experience using DIME?

I was out of the office, and just noticed this thread.

Are you using WSE? WSE3 has DIME built in, and you can turn it on with a
flag in the config file. Very easy to use, and it will automatically be
used anywhere a byte array is being sent.

Erick

-----Original Message-----
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J. Merrill
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 8:36 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Anyone have experience using DIME?

At 09:57 AM 6/17/2005, Angela Tocco wrote (in part)
>The trick is I cant use sockets because the
application is using .Net
>Remoting and it has to be able to go through port 80,
outbound only.

If you have two clients that are each restricted to "outbound only"
(regardless of port restrictions), they won't be able to talk to each
other -- neither can accept a connection from the other so there's no
way to establish a direct connection.  That has nothing to do with .Net
or DIME or anything; it's just TCP/IP.  You need a server to stand in
the middle.  (How could the two clients learn about each other?  If each
communicates with the server, then there's a place to hold the list of
all clients; without that...)

If all you're doing is uploading and downloading files, perhaps you
should just use FTP.

Good luck.  (BTW, why are messages from "Angela Tocco"
signed "Steve"?)

J. Merrill / Analytical Software Corp

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r)
http://www.develop.com

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
http://discuss.develop.com

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor.
http://www.develop.com

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
http://discuss.develop.com




____________________________________________________
Yahoo! Sports
Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football
http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r)  http://www.develop.com

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
http://discuss.develop.com

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentorĀ®  http://www.develop.com

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com

Reply via email to