Of course, I meant a compiler targeting .NET framework and producing managed assemblies - sorry for confusion.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Tuliper > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 6:33 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] What is the .NET equivalent of > Java's MANIFEST.MF? > > Sure (if Im reading all of this correctly) this is > essentially what happens with obj files in any good c > compilers build process. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dmitry Shaporenkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thu, 01 December 2005 12:55:35 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] What is the .NET equivalent of > Java's MANIFEST.MF? > > Is anybody aware of such an advanced compiler? > > Offtopic: > > In my experience, long build time > of large C# solutions containing of many projects wich > complex dependencies is one of the biggest problems with > VS.NET (both 2003 and Whidbey). If one changes the > implementation of a method in one of the root projects (that > all other projects depend upon) VS performs totally > unnecessary rebuild of all other projects, although only > implementation changed, not the interface of the root > project. I know this is offtopic, but it's interesting what > approaches do people use to tackle this problem? It seems for > me that Java classfiles are much better suited for > incremental build, and hence Java development environments > have had such a possibility for a long time already. And > we're still in the stone ages... > > P.S. Many people would object that separating interface and > implementation into different assemblies is a solution to the > problem. I don't really think so as this is not always > applicable and tends to create too many projects. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian > > Griffiths > > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 3:42 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] What is the .NET equivalent > of Java's > > MANIFEST.MF? > > > > > > (As an implementation detail, there's nothing stopping a compiler > > performing some kind of optimization here. For example, > your compiler > > could compile each individual source file into > per-source-file binary > > files that it stores as part of its build output. So it wouldn't > > actually need to recompile everything. So whether or not the > > recompilation really happens depends on the compiler. But > that's just > > the implementation detail - all that really matters is: > does the build > > take too long?..) > > > > > > -- > > Ian Griffiths - Pluralsight > > http://www.interact-sw.co.uk/iangblog/ > > > > =================================== > This list is hosted by DevelopMentorR http://www.develop.com > > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at > http://discuss.develop.com > > ------------------------------------------------- > Sent using http://www.DWmail.net, a free service Check your > email [any email, anytime, anywhere] > ------------------------------------------------- > Disclaimer: DWmail.net is not responsible for the content > sent via it's services. Additional header information is > included regarding the source of an email. If you believe an > email is junk you should look for the 'Originating IP' message header > > =================================== > This list is hosted by DevelopMentorR http://www.develop.com > > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at > http://discuss.develop.com =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
