On one troublesome occasion I found that on one users machine only, a
function that contained just one line of code was never run.
(this was to seperate code that could be obfuscated from code that couldn't)
Once I added a couple of extra lines for tracing the code ran fine.
I'd be looking at what happens if you expand 'If lista.Count = 0 then
FillFunction()' into multiple lines.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vitor Dantas de Andrade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM>
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 2:07 AM
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] RES: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] .NET IS CRAZY ...
Hi everybody,
Sorry about the code ... I sent the picture but you didn´t get it ...
The code is very simple, its like :
If lista.Count = 0 then FillFunction()
The problem is, when i get to this line, the debugger shows lista.Count = 3,
but the code enters the FillFunction()
Lista is a generics list
I found that the code is running right, but Visual Studio is showing the
wrong value on the watch list. It´s a bug, but on Vstudio rather then the
framework ...
Thanks,
Vitor
-----Mensagem original-----
De: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Frans Bouma
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 10 de fevereiro de 2006 06:32
Para: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Assunto: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] .NET IS CRAZY ...
Sorry, I was only joking, I do not suspect the framework is crazy.
I know, Paul ;)
My COM days are thankfully a distant memory!!!
I don't understand this that much, but perhaps you had a horrific
experience with the wonderful world of COM and DCOM and I can fully
understand you therefore are happy with every millimeter you can get away
from it ;)
FB, who has to admit 'Essential COM' was a bit complex
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: Frans Bouma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Discussion of advanced .NET topics."
><ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM>
>To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
>Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] .NET IS CRAZY ...
>Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:12:10 +0100
>
> > The whole framework is corrupt!!!!!
> >
> > I'm going back to ASP et. COM!!!!
>
> COM and DCOM aren't that bad, the performance of DCOM still
>beats .NET's equivalents hands down and ATL is pretty cool too.
>It's just that this cool tech is simply lacking easy to use
tooling ala
>delphi. I mean: delphi managed to offer C++ speed
programming and also
>COM/DCOM creating abilities without the 'don't touch this comments,
>bubba! we know they're just comments but they're precious material,
>alright?'-goo.
>
> FB
>
>===================================
>This list is hosted by DevelopMentorR http://www.develop.com
>
>View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
>http://discuss.develop.com
===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentorR http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
http://discuss.develop.com
===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor. http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
