> I may not have been clear; but, I'm not saying all > strong-named assemblies > are "granted" FullTrust I'm saying (when they don't refuse it > or use APTC) > the implicit LinkDemand for FullTrust means their code can't > run without > it.
The implicit demand on a strongly named assembly (A, for example) that you're talking about is demanding that the *calling* assembly (B, for example) has full trust unless assembly A has the APTC attribute. Those docs aren't saying that someone is demanding that assembly B has full trust. They're saying that since A is strongly named, the runtime implicitly demands that *callers of A* are fully trusted (or that A uses the APTC attribute to relax that requirement). It seems to me you're still confused about what the link demand is affecting... -Mike Bear Canyon Consulting LLC http://www.bearcanyon.com http://www.pluralsight.com/mike =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
